<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rfc on As it was</title>
    <link>https://galoishlee.github.io/tags/rfc/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Rfc on As it was</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>zh-CN</language>
    <managingEditor>maocred@gmail.com (Halois)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>maocred@gmail.com (Halois)</webMaster>
    <copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://galoishlee.github.io/tags/rfc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Hash To Curve</title>
      <link>https://galoishlee.github.io/hash-to-curve/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><author>maocred@gmail.com (Halois)</author>
      <guid>https://galoishlee.github.io/hash-to-curve/</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Reading: RFC 9380, &lt;em&gt;Hashing to Elliptic Curves&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Core problem: given an arbitrary byte string, produce a point in the correct elliptic-curve subgroup, with the distribution and side-channel properties a protocol actually needs. This is not “hash to an $x$ and try to solve for $y$”.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The RFC answer is a pipeline, not a trick:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;$$&#xA;\text{bytes} \rightarrow \text{field elements} \rightarrow \text{curve points} \rightarrow \text{subgroup points}&#xA;$$&lt;p&gt;plus domain separation and constant-time constraints.&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:1&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This note only tracks that structure: what object the RFC is defining, why &lt;code&gt;encode_to_curve&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;hash_to_curve&lt;/code&gt; differ, and why suites such as secp256k1 and BLS12-381 are built the way they are.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
